This is the internal P4 vs P5 breakdown — both the JNR vape Stellarc 100K Kit and the P5 GlassRock 100K Kit are part of the same JNR vape 100,000-puff refillable platform. The same 10 prefilled flavors run on both devices; pick a starting flavor from the JNR vape flavors hub before checkout — airflow on each hub shifts how the flavor reads, but the formula is identical across SKUs. Sacramento same-day dispatch with state-by-state delivery on JNR Vape Near Me.
HOME · COMPARE · P4 STELLARC 100K KIT vs JNR P5 GLASSROCK 100K
EDITORIAL COMPARISON
COMPARE
JNR Stellarc 100K vs GlassRock 100K — Which JNR Kit to Buy
Same family, different draws. The P4 Stellarc has the premium curved screen and dual-battery voltage stability; the P5 GlassRock has the largest e-liquid reservoir in the JNR lineup.
OUR PICK
JNR Stellarc 100K Vape Kit
VAPORESSO · REFILLABLE KIT + REPLACEABLE POD
$23.99
$32.99
PUFFS
100K
BATTERY
1200 mAh
FLAVORS
10
CHIP
TFC™
vs
Split SCORE
COMPARED AGAINST
JNR P5 GlassRock 100K
JNR (SAME FAMILY)
$24.99
$34.99
JNR P5 GLASSROCK 100K
PUFFS
100K
BATTERY
1,000 mAh single cell
E-LIQUID
64 mL
CHARGE
35-50 min
SCREEN
Mini battery indicator
TL;DR VERDICT
JNR Stellarc 100K Kit ($23.99) and JNR GlassRock 100K Kit ($24.99) both rate at 100,000 puffs with the same 10-flavor library at 5% salt nicotine. Stellarc differentiates with a curved Stellar-animation screen, 1,200 + 280 mAh dual-battery system (1,480 mAh combined), and tighter MTL-style airflow. GlassRock differentiates with a 1,000 mAh single-cell architecture, 64 mL reservoir (largest in the lineup), mini battery indicator, and open airflow. Pick by screen UX preference and airflow style — both deliver the same flavor library.
Split
JNR WINS
Spec-by-Spec Breakdown — Where Each Device Wins
01
Split
Battery architecture — dual cell vs single cell
P4 Stellarc uses dual cells (280 mAh control + 1,200 mAh main = 1,480 mAh combined). P5 GlassRock uses a single 1,000 mAh cell. Stellarc holds voltage more stable across the full pod life because the chip/screen do not compete with the coil for power. GlassRock's simpler architecture has fewer failure points and charges faster. Stellarc wins on stability; GlassRock wins on charge speed (35-50 min vs 45-65 min).
02
JNR P5 GlassRock 100K wins
E-liquid reservoir — 32 mL vs 64 mL pod
P4 Stellarc ships with a 32 mL pod. P5 GlassRock ships with a 64 mL pod — double the reservoir, the largest in the JNR lineup. For users running through pods quickly (200+ puffs/day), the P5 reservoir means fewer pod swaps per kit life. Both are rated 100,000 puffs across the full kit; the P5 reaches that rating with a single jumbo pod, the P4 may need a replacement mid-life depending on use.
03
P4 Stellarc 100K Kit wins
Screen UX — curved Stellar animation vs mini battery indicator
P4 Stellarc has a curved high-contrast screen running the Stellar animation theme — battery percentage, juice level on the docked pod, and an ambient animation pattern visible from any front angle. P5 GlassRock has a small mini screen with a battery indicator only — no juice gauge, no animation. For users who like to know exactly where their device sits, Stellarc delivers more information density. For users who want a clean uncluttered device, GlassRock's minimal screen is sufficient.
04
Split
Airflow style — tight MTL vs open
P4 Stellarc has a tighter mouth-to-lung (MTL) airflow that concentrates the flavor and produces a denser draw. P5 GlassRock has a more open airflow that lightens the flavor and produces a breezier draw. Same juice library on both, but the perception shifts: Stellarc reads as concentrated and dessert-like on rich flavors (Mexican Mango), GlassRock reads as refreshing and water-fresh on iced flavors (Watermelon Ice). Pick by preference; both are good.
05
JNR P5 GlassRock 100K wins
Charge time — 45-65 min vs 35-50 min
P4 Stellarc charges in 45-65 min from 0 to 100% via USB-C at 5V/1A (the dual-battery package takes a bit longer). P5 GlassRock charges in 35-50 min — the fastest in the JNR lineup, thanks to the simpler single-cell architecture and slightly lower total capacity. Neither device supports pass-through (you cannot vape while charging on either).
06
Split
Price per puff and economics
Stellarc: $23.99 ÷ 100,000 puffs = $0.24 per 1K puffs. GlassRock: $24.99 ÷ 100,000 = $0.25 per 1K puffs. Roughly identical price-per-rated-puff math. Replacement pod economics also similar: P4 pod $21.99, P5 pod $22.99. The $1 sticker difference is marginal — pick by feature preference, not pricing.
07
Split
Flavor library compatibility
Both devices run the same 10-flavor library at 5% salt nicotine — Blue Razz Ice, Sour Apple Ice, Watermelon Ice, Miami Mint, Mexican Mango, White Peach Raspberry, Strawberry Kiwi, Strawberry Watermelon, Lemon Heads, Sour Fcuking Fab. <strong>Pods are NOT cross-compatible</strong> — the P4 Stellarc pod and P5 GlassRock pod have different chassis profiles and dock geometries. Pick a kit and stay within its pod family for replacements.
PRICE PER PUFF · THE NUMBERS
Price-Per-Puff Math — The Cost Comparison That Matters
JNR STELLARC 100K VAPE KIT
$0.24
PER 1,000 PUFFS · SALE $23.99
Most flavor breadth · TFC chip · forward-pod
JNR P4 STELLARC 100K POD (REFILL)
$0.75
PER 1,000 PUFFS · SALE $14.99
Cheapest in this analysis — but needs a hub
JNR P5 GLASSROCK 100K (COMPARED)
$0.25
PER 1,000 PUFFS · SALE $24.99
Largest reservoir in the JNR lineup
BUY JNR IF
P4 Stellarc — premium screen, dual-battery voltage stability.
- ✓You want the curved Stellar-animation screen and the battery + juice readout the P5 lacks.
- ✓You value the dual-battery split (280 mAh control + 1,200 mAh main) for voltage stability from first puff to last.
- ✓You prefer a tighter MTL-style draw with a denser flavor concentration.
- ✓You want the slightly lower sticker price ($23.99 vs $24.99).
BUY JNR P5 GLASSROCK 100K IF
P5 GlassRock — largest reservoir, longest runtime per pod.
- •You want the largest e-liquid reservoir in the JNR lineup — 64 mL per pod.
- •You prefer an open, breezier airflow for cleaner fruit and mint notes.
- •You do not need a curved screen — a mini battery indicator is enough information.
- •You want the simplest possible architecture (single cell, fewer failure points).